login   |    register
Dragon Models [ MORE REVIEWS ] [ WEB SITE ] [ NEW STORIES ]

Built Review
172
Tiger I and Tiger Aces
Tiger I Late Production w/Zimmerit + Tiger Aces
  • move

by: Jan Etal [ TREAD_GEEK ]


Originally published on:
Armorama

Introduction

With this kit release, Dragon Model has once again treated the modeller to what might be called a combo kit. In this case we are presented with a Tiger I Late Production variant with Zimmerit and a new figure set that they call “Tiger Aces”.

For all intents and purposes the Tiger I is a recycling of the Late Production Sd.Kfz.181 Ausf. E, kit 7203. From various sources it has been suggested that the “Panzer Aces” figures are downsized versions from a previously released 1/35 scale offering. A bit of searching revealed that the original 1/35 set (kit 6028) was released in June 2003 and these appear to be the smaller version of that set.

To anyone interested in German World War Two armour, I am sure that the phrase "Tiger Aces" immediately conjures up the name Michael Wittmann. Whether these figures are meant to represent his crew is open to speculation.

The subject of this review is the Dragon Model Armor Pro, Sd. Kfz. 181 Tiger I Late Production w/Zimmerit Tiger Aces, kit 7440.

Contents

On opening the somewhat larger than average box, one is immediately presented with a plethora of parts. Presented were five moderately large sprues moulded in the standard Dragon Model grey styrene. These are contained in separate bags. There is no standard Dragon Model accessory card but one will find separate bags containing a pair of Dragon Model DS plastic tracks, a single small photo-etch fret, brass muffler shrouds and a set of Cartograph water-slide decals.

A four sided instruction card is provided displaying a parts diagram, two pages with six assembly steps in the form of coloured CAD images with arrows for parts placement and one page showing painting and markings. The painting and marking illustrations are for one of four tanks, all painted in three colour camouflage.
  • 2./s.Pz.Abt.101, Normandy 1944
  • 1./s.Pz.Abt.101, Normandy 1944
  • 9./Pz.Rgt.3, “Totenkampf”, Poland 1944
  • 2./s.Pz.Abt.102, Normandy 1944

The colour references provided are for the GSI Creos Corp Aqueous Hobby Color, the same company’s Mr. Color and Model Master enamels.

Sprue and parts breakdown is as follows:
  • Sprue ‘A’ - 25 (Tiger detail Pieces)
  • Sprue ‘B’ - 58 (Two Sprues with Suspension Wheels)
  • Sprue ‘C’ - 10 (Gun and Tiger detail Pieces)
  • Sprue ‘D’ - 2 (DS Tracks)
  • Sprue ‘E’ - 1 (Upper Hull)
  • Sprue ‘F’ - 1 (Lower Hull)
  • Sprue ? - 25 (unlabeled Figure Sprue)
  • Fret “MA’ - 2 Photo Etch (Exhaust Shrouds)
  • Fret “MB’ - 3 Photo Etch Turret Ring Pieces

Total parts count is 127 with 5 styrene parts marked as unused.

Review

Essentially this is basically two individual kits in one box. The styrene parts of both are moulded in lighter grey coloured plastic and the DS-100 parts in a light tan colour. As with most Dragon Model Armor Pro kits that I have seen, these kit(s) looked promising. As stated in the introduction, the Tiger I is virtually the same kit (#7203) that was originally released in June 2004. It has been the subject of a built review here on Armorama.

Ejector marks are minimal and where they do appear they are mostly on internal surfaces that will not show after construction or be otherwise hidden after the addition of extra parts. Some flash was present on some of the Tiger parts. This flash and most seam lines were generally light and could be taken care of with a scraping of a sharp hobby blade. Sprue attachment points (gates) for the parts were all over the place. A number on the larger Tiger parts are quite large and will require care with their removal.

The Tiger in this kit was previously released as Kit No. 7203; Sd. Kfz. 181 Ausf. E Tiger I Late Production w/Zimmerit. Altogether, six steps in the instructions deal solely with the Tiger’s construction.

Tiger Ace Figures
The figures are multi-piece affairs with separate arms, legs, heads, torso and head-covering. All the pieces are on one medium sized sprue. The moulding is good and there is little flash and the moulding seams are quite light.

There are five figures one of which is a three-quarter figure on the sprue, as one has no legs below the knee. This partial figure is posed in a erect position and ideally meant to occupy an open loaders hatch. The other four full figures are in various poses with two being in a sitting position and two standing.

While new to Braille scale, the original set on which they are based is an older moulding (2003). This original set has the moulding considered to be on the soft side and not quite as sharp compared to today’s standards. The 1/72 figures are good for the scale but in this reviewer’s opinion, not quite up to the sharpness of detail found in some more recent kits that include figures. The reader should also note that unlike their 1/35 brethren (and other 1/72 Dragon Model figures), there is no equipment (pistol holsters, binoculars etc) provided.

Build Observations

The Tiger I
As mentioned above, the Tiger I and it’s fellow Dragon Model cousins have reviews here on Armorama as well as other sites. Rather than go into extensive detail this reviewer will just present the quick observations from his experience.

Step 1 and 2 are the assembly of all the suspension components onto the lower hull. All these pieces are one piece mouldings. Fit overall was good although it can take a bit of fiddling to get everything lined up to fit on their respective shafts. Due to all the interleaving of the pieces it would probably be best to paint the pieces separately beforehand. This version used the steel road wheels so there is no need to worry about painting the rubber portion of each wheel.

In Step 3 the entire turret is constructed and should present few problems for an experienced modeller. The only issue might be the seam at the back of the turret. Due to the moulded on Zimmerit there is a visible partition line between the two turret side halves. As there is a turret rear storage bin, the area it covers could be ignored. That just leaves small areas at the top above the bin and below it to be taken into account.

With Step 4 the upper hull is assembled and detailed and from previous builds of Tiger I kits I foresee few issues.

Construction is completed in Step 5 and 6 with the attachment of the tracks and then the three main pieces of lower hull, upper hull and turret.

The Tiger Aces Figures
The figure instructions are coloured pictures of the assembled figure with parts callout and somewhat ambiguous painting instructions. There are no mating features between parts other than the head/neck fitting into a shallow depression at the top of the torso.

Figure 1 is a sitting figure meant to be positioned on the front turret roof with one foot resting on the main gun. The moulding was rather rough and parts do not align well.

Figure 2 is the partial figure without legs below the knees. It is to be posed in the open loaders hatch with the left hand holding the top of the hatch. This will not be possible with this version of the tank as the hatch in question is moulded on. It would take a fair amount of effort and skill to convert the hatch to an open configuration. Amusingly, the underside of the moulded on hatch has some interior detail.

Figure 3 is a full figure meant to sit in an open drivers hatch with the left arm resting along the edge of the turret mantlet top. As pertains to the figure 2, the drivers hatch is moulded in the closed position.

Figure 4 is a standing NCO (non-commissioned officer) with hands on hips. There is a fairly good fit to most parts but a split between the legs will need to be filled.

Figure 5 has often been referred to as the “Michael Wittmann” figure. It had overall good parts fit and has a simple yet unique pose. The figure is erect with the right hand holding a set of headphones and left hand up towards the face at collar level.

Three of the figures are wearing side caps and mating them with the head may be quite daunting for the less experienced. The caps have a fairly substantial sprue gate at their back end. Both the head part and the cap are extremely small. It will probably be best to attached the head to the torso first and then the cap to the head. Any clean-up should then wait until the parts have dried solidly.

In fact, many of the figures’ attachment points proved substantial enough to require some serious clean-up time. Each figure’s construction and clean-up had its unique challenges. This is partly due to the small size but also the unique poses.

Conclusions

This kit is both an interesting combination and a pleasant surprise. It has been a while since the release of the Panther and Tiger II kits with figures. Dare it be suggested here that perhaps we may see even more of these combination kits from time to time. Overall both these kits have their pluses and minuses but I experienced just a few difficulties with the review sample(s).

Having built earlier Dragon Model Tiger I models in the past, I can attest that this version goes together with far less problems than the previous ones. While it doesn't have a large number of PE parts like The Tiger I Mid Production w/Zimmerit (kit 7251), it is still a serviceable kit.

The one disappointing aspect of the figures is that only three are usable with this tank. In their original configuration, the partial loader and the driver cannot be used due to the moulded on closed hatches. However, a use for these unsuitable figures may find a home adorning some other vehicle in the builder’s collection.

Armorama Built Review of Tiger I Late

Tiger 1 Build Live links
SUMMARY
Highs: Interesting combination with fair to good detail and fit. Figures are most welcome.
Lows: Some vagueness in instructions as to exact parts location. No separate tools on Tiger I and no equipment for figures. Will require extra work to use figures with this Tiger.
Verdict: A pleasing combination especially for those willing to put some extra work into correcting the Tiger’s deficiencies (closed hatches).
Percentage Rating
75%
  Scale: 1:72
  Mfg. ID: 7440
  Suggested Retail: $24.95
  Related Link: Tiger I Late w/Zimmerit
  PUBLISHED: Jun 07, 2014
  NATIONALITY: Germany
NETWORK-WIDE AVERAGE RATINGS
  THIS REVIEWER: 84.51%
  MAKER/PUBLISHER: 86.19%

Our Thanks to Dragon USA!
This item was provided by them for the purpose of having it reviewed on this KitMaker Network site. If you would like your kit, book, or product reviewed, please contact us.
View Vendor Homepage  More Reviews  

Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
About Jan Etal (tread_geek)
FROM: ONTARIO, CANADA

I've been building models since about age 10 with the occasional hiatus due to real life events. First armour model was a 1/76 Airfix Tiger I and was followed by a 1/72 Revell F4U Corsair. I've built primarily 1/76 and 1/72 armour and aircraft but occasionally have tinkered in other larger scales....

Copyright ©2017 text by Jan Etal [ TREAD_GEEK ]. Images also by copyright holder unless otherwise noted. Opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of TankRat's. All rights reserved.


Reader Reviews
Do you own this item and want to review it? You can add your review of the item here. Please read the reader review instructions before posting.


Comments

Very informative review but kind of disappointing that Dragon didn't have the tank have open hatches for the two crew meant to go in those hatches. Jan, you didn't make mention of a problem with the width of the rear idler. I've read several reviews that say the Tiger I idlers on the Dragon tanks need some surgery for the tracks to fit properly. The build review you link to says there was a need to trim one of the idler halves. Is this the case with this kit also? Regards, AJ
JUN 07, 2014 - 10:20 AM
My thanks to Darren for getting this one up so quickly. I know that there's been a lot of talk lately about this kit with little "concrete" information available. @weathering_one - AJ, I too was quite disappointed about the closed hatches as the end result with all five figures would have bee quite something. I am sure that each individual will come to their own conclusions about this kit. As for the idler, it appears that not only does the idler appear the proper thickness but the entire sprue appears new. I've checked the sprues of many, if not all the Tiger I kits and could not find one that uses the exact same 'B' sprue as in this kit. Cheers, Jan
JUN 07, 2014 - 01:22 PM
I see Dragon still haven't sorted the solid drive sprockets. Shame as they had the ideal opportunity to fix it. The figures look very good though. Nivce review Jan
JUN 07, 2014 - 06:41 PM
The solid drive sprockets should not cause too much of a problem other than they will require some skill and finesse when painting them. However, I agree with you and with Dragons slide-moulding one might have expected something better. there are enough examples of Dragon producing sprockets with lightening holes of varying configurations in other of their kits (Panthers, Churchill, Chi Ha...). Thanks for the kudo about the review but comparing the figures in this kit to those with the PaK-40 gun crew, I'd have to say the gun crew is quite a bit superior. Thanks for taking the time to have a look and comment. Cheers, Jan
JUN 08, 2014 - 09:52 AM
On the figures but non opening hatches, what to say? Perhaps a diorama with the Tiger parked up by a pub, hatches down to stop anyone nicking it, the crew sitting / standing in the beer garden with their 3/4 length mate standing in a couple of feet of water in the drainage ditch that he hadn't spotted. If only the others were laughing. I notice the box to illustration insert helpfully shows a crew member in an open hatch. Dear oh dear.
JUN 09, 2014 - 10:39 AM
I believe that there isn't much to say that won't be obvious to the vast majority. While a diorama with these two sets comes to mind, there is one important element missing. At least on this side on the pond, a diorama is expected to tell a story. Since the crew figures are posed to be relaxed after a hard day on the battlefield, there is no action implied by their poses. This at least might garner a yawn from the judges. The 3/4 figure is meant to occupy the open loaders hatch and the driver was to have his feet jutting into his hatch. Could we perhaps accuse/sue Dragon on the grounds of false advertising. BTW, your diorama idea does have merit (a beer garden scene) but alas as you point out, exhaustion more than levity is more apparent on the facial features. I do have a Stug III in the stash and the 3/4 figure might fit perfectly into an open loaders hatch. Cheers, Jan
JUN 09, 2014 - 12:20 PM
To be fair, at least here are some figures with a vehicle kit, a lack of which I have bemoaned before, so that is to be applauded, even if they're not quite right. The Dragon website has this carefully phased piece of marketing: The figures may be grouped together on a Tiger as indicated in the box-top art, or they can be mix and matched with any other German tank type. The fact that the Tiger I is accompanied by such an impressive crew puts this set in a class of its own, for no other manufacturer offers such an ideal combination!
JUN 09, 2014 - 01:35 PM
It's true that many of us small scale builders have bemoaned the lack of suitable crew figures from this company. Indeed, I have run into a number of individuals that have bought this kit solely for these figures. One individual I recall has gone so far as to buy five kits and then offer the Tigers to "good homes" for the cost of postage. While I am not really a figure type tinkerer, I can see that there might be some potential for modifying some of the figures' poses. Perhaps Dragon might consider packaging several sets of these figures from the various kits that have them as a separate kit unto itself? The market is definitely out there! Cheers, Jan
JUN 09, 2014 - 03:01 PM
Well... I thought the Caesar Miniatures Panzer crew were pretty decent, and with some OK poses.
JUN 09, 2014 - 05:06 PM
Tip: Just hit enter to submit your reply!
   
What's Your Opinion?


Photos
Click image to enlarge
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move
  • move